Oops! Where's the link?
Oh, here it is.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=Travel/NorthEast_2012/Bridgton_Fryeburg/Fryeburg_Fair>
On 10/30/2012 10:24 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 10/30/2012 8:47 PM, Paul Braun wrote:
>> I've had Olympus gear since my first OM2n in college.
> OMs didn't exist when I was in college. I started with an OM-1 in about '74.
>
>> ...
>> I do this mostly as a hobby - I don't get a lot of money for the online
>> stuff, so a fully-pro body is out of the question. So is a $15,000
>> superfast tele.
>>
>> I now cast out amongst the brains on this list - make a few
>> recommendations for me. Something in the prosumer range. The main need
>> is for excellent performance in low light. And I will need a flash. I
>> would consider a one-generation-back used body if it meant I had more
>> money towards a lens and flash.
>>
>> I await your answers.
> Here are some shots of a gig my friend's band did at the Fryeburg (ME) Fair.
> They could look a lot better, but I simply
> downsized the JPEGs, right out of the camera. No RAW, no NR, etc., so you can
> see what's the worst you can expect.
>
> They start out at ISO 1000, with some daylight left, then work their way up
> to ISO 6400, as the light dies, only the
> funky stage lighting is available and I move to longer, slower focal lengths.
> Obviously, the lighting pretty warm, but I
> didn't adjust WB either.
>
> Shot with E-M5, 14-150 and 75-300.
>
> Maybe there's an OM (-D) again for you. :-)
>
> Concertina Moose
>
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|