It probably is. Although commercial shooters used it once as a sort of live
view, in the final years, it was relegated to "fine art" photographers, who
shot almost exclusively in the studio. As polaroid hade a lot of latitude,
they wouldn't have needed to throw much away, and quantity took second place
to quality. Probably where it will be continued to be used. With, of course,
the occasional rich dilletante.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Whitmire
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2012 1:37 PM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] More Bad Kodak News
Looks Impossibly expensive to me.
--Bob
On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
>
>>
>> And now even for the 8x10" die-hards ;-)
>>
>> http://www.dpreview.com/articles/5797413008/exhibition-review-8x10-by-impossible
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|