But I do wonder what is the actual resolution of an OM focusing screen.
I've not used any of the high res screens like the OM-D E-M5 has but
I'm not convinced it's any worse than out little pieces of fogged plastic.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/25/2012 8:05 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Well said. Very well said.
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>> I don't want to fly a video game, I want to compose
>> a picture in the context of reality. I want to move my frame around in
>> the beautiful, organic, analogue realm of the photons that are reflected
>> off my subject. I want my eyes to experience the same, actual
>> wavelengths of light. Therein lies the emotional connection with the
>> image about to be made. I don't want those photons captured, quantized,
>> processed, amplified, and re-imagined as a crude grid of luminous pixels
>> at a woefully inadequate framerate.
>>
>> Electronic viewfinders are a low-resolution affront to my photographic
>> senses, and if I were forced to use them I would rather not photograph
>> at all. They are like a pair of fidelity-reducing goggles applied to my
>> vision, and I well and truly hate the experience of using them.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|