Manure? Not at all! I think the X-Pro 1 is great, and I was so close to
getting one. I'm just with Ken on this one though - happy to wait a bit
longer.
I could never be content with a camera that focuses on something for me,
without giving me any indicating as to where that actually us. I can see
how that could be great for certain type of photography - usually
involving people, or scenics - but not for mine.
I am much too attached and involved in the focusing process. I just
can't use a 4x5in camera and then an electronic viewfinder the next, the
difference is too great. I need a good ground glass, or a good
rangefinder :-)
Enjoy your X-Pro 1 - I am a little bit envious, believe it or not!
Dawid
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 18:13 +0200, SwissPace wrote:
> Dawid,
>
> I am not afraid to disagree with you about the viewfinder ;-), I like it
> and prefer it to the OM-D version although I wish the EVF was as quick
> as the OM-D's, The OVF is great, compose wait for green rectangle t
> confirm focus and click.
>
> I am not finding too much problem with focussing but that will depend
> upon use, I feel that I am getting more keepers than with my canyon 5D2
> and although the OM-D is nice to use (my wife has one) I prefer my
> X-pro1 and I dispute the fact they got it so wrong, quirky yes but a
> failure no, I will say though that the learning curve at the begining
> is steeper than other cameras but then to compensate it's also a much
> shorter one ;-).
>
> And for the most important bit the lenses and sensor are giving me the
> results I like. I hope to post some more shots from it soon. The actual
> best bit though is finally I am no longer interested in the next system
> because like my car, watch, motorcycle, aerostitch, macbook etc.. I have
> the best possible fit for me, well I have grown a slight bit for the 20
> year old 'stitch ;-) but it still does the job and now I can concentrate
> on just taking photos if you see what I mean.
>
> One person's manure is another person's gold !
>
> On 24/08/2012 12:50, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> > NOW we're talking. The X-Pro 1 viewfinder is a farce, because it's not a
> > real rangefinder. Who really cares about looking through a glass
> > viewfinder if it has no focusing features whatsoever?
> >
> > The X-Pro 1 is a camera that can not focus well manually or
> > automatically, this being the great undoing of an otherwise fantastic
> > device and system. Amazing how they can get it so wrong. There will only
> > ever be one "X-Pro 1" - I wish they had got it right.
> >
> >
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|