On 8/22/2012 7:52 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> There's a guy on FM that has one and seems to think it's some rare valuable
>> item, despite his being filled with fungus. Other than uncommonness, it has
>> nothing going for it. Specs-wise, it was an economy design, and not even all
>> that good a one. There's a reason they never bothered to produce it.
> Who knows the minds behind that one. At this point it really doesn't matter
> very much. A zoom lens of that range is about perfect to me, but the F4
> aspect totally defeats the purpose of it. This isn't a lens intended for
> the landscapists, it's a lens intended for the event photographer who needs
> a lens centering around 35mm with a bunch of flexibility on either side. As
> it isn't an F2.8, this forces the lens into the neither fish/fowl category.
I got's me a Tokina AT-X 24-40/2.8 sittin' here, awaitin' your interest.
EX+ condition, complete with case, box, hood, caps and manual.
Let's Make a Deal Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|