I agree with you, Bob. Anything else is too much like a Polaroid. I have
an SX-70 in the closet that never pleased me with its results.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Whitmire" <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 7:07 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Dead Letter Box - The Sequel
> Not exactly, Going through the computer allows the photographer to realize
> the vision in a much more comprehensive manner than shooting straight from
> camera to Facebook. That may have a wow factor, but that's all it is, a
> wow factor. This is not about how swiftly one can post, or how little post
> processing one can do. For me, it's about realizing a vision. That's not
> something that can be done in haste. it takes time. Days, weeks, months.
> Sometimes years. I've got a few new photos out this year proving popular
> that I shot years ago but lacked either the vision or the skill to
> properly process.
>
> Stupid is, IMHO, a bad choice of words.
>
> --Bob, who is no Moose.
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> I really do want my next digital camera to have built-in WiFi
>> capability.Having to go through a computer for anything is quite
>> stupid these days.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|