On 8/15/2012 2:39 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't mean to question your veracity. I believe you when you
> say your system performs better after you've run "program accelerator".
> I just don't understand how it can do what it claims to do since I
> don't think even the OS knows how to do that.
Back to the basics of scientific investigation. Measure phenomena, form
theories to explain experience, then test them.
When data disagrees with theory;
a. The program works.
b. "I don't think even the OS knows how to do that."
One must revise or abandon the theory. :-)
> I need to do some further
> checking on Windows memory management. The implication is that orphaned
> memory is somehow tagged with the process it belonged to. I'd like to
> know if that's true and if not I'm even further mystified.
Put on your lab coat, and get to work! Me, I'm just happy to have a useful
tool. But then, I only wrote end user
software, not OS stuff. ;-)
Good hunting!
> Chuck Norcutt
> (old orphaned memory chaser... who once had 20 IBM and Microsoft
> programmers working for 6 weeks to find and fix a memory leak)
Now, we just buy more memory. :-D
Memorable Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|