Larry,
Thanks for the info. There are a couple of issues as far as the 12-60
goes, one is the AF performance which has gotten mixed reviews, your
comment is more reassuring as far as that goes. The more pressing issue
is that I will most likely need to sell it in order to fund purchase of
an OM-D kit. :( Also good to hear that the 12-50 is turning out to be a
winner as it is the most likely replacement to the 12-60 if I do make
the switch. Much to ponder here!
What do you think of the Pana 20? It is one lens I am very interested
in. It is a strong motivating factor pushing me toward the OM-D purchase.
Jim Couch
On 8/9/2012 1:10 PM, Lawrence Plummer wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I have the 12-50mm, Oly 12mm, Pana 14mm & 20mm in M43 format. I'm also using
> my FourThirds
> Oly 11-22mm, 70-300mm as well as my Leica and Oly OM lenses, with adapters.
> I picked up the MMF-3
> for free with the initial purchase.
>
> With the OM-D, why do you have to miss your 12-60???? The only drawback will
> be a touch slower
> autofocus. The 70-300mm (that I just got) is actually pretty quick autofocus
> and with the IBIS is
> giving terrific, hand held shots at 300mm!
>
> I have found the 12-50mm to be a very, very good lense. Recent reviews are
> seconding that opinion.
>
> The 12mm is absolutely spectacular.
>
> larry plummer
> seattle
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|