Subject: | Re: [OM] Eeeek! |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 03 Aug 2012 10:13:08 -0700 |
> I often had less DOF than I would have liked.... As far as the physics, been there. (yawn, eyes glazed over) I believe this link was previously posted: <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/resolution.shtml> From a practical perspective who cares if you have the full 10mp or whatever data of an OOF photo? I happily crank down the ring on my 135/4.5 macro and don't look back. The higher sensor pixel count has other benefits than pure resolution. If one wants to do the focusing stage/stacking thing then optimize the aperture of course. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Tour de Jylland, Jim Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] IMG: Ant and Codes, Jim Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Jim Nichols |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Eeeek!, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |