On 7/31/2012 12:31 PM, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> ...
> Hmm, perhaps "flare" is too generic - I am talking about retention of
> contrast and suppression of secondary reflections with bright point
> light light sources in the image. And specifically the 35-100/2.0.
>
> ...
>
> The performance level is just ridiculous - it's almost wrong for a lens
> to be this good.
>
> ...
>
> The resolution, field-flatness, even illumination... is not just good,
> it's *brutal*. Words fail me. Nothing is supposed to perform like this
> at f/2.0 - never mind a zoom lens. I'm in a bit of shock actually.
But really, wouldn't it be a shame if all the progress in lens materials and
design, extremely high and low dispersion
glasses, finer coatings and aspheric surfaces, didn't achieve improvements over
what was possible before?
Pedantic As Ever Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|