| Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Insects |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2012 15:21:58 -0700 |
On 7/29/2012 2:04 PM, Ken Norton wrote: > Diffraction and DoF calculations are ALWAYS output based. Ah, would that that were true. A more accurate statement might be: Diffraction and DOF calculations SHOULD always be output based. :-) Persnickety Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] MFT lens corrections in ACR or LR, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Software Solution!, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Insects, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Insects, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |