I'm not a critical of them as Ken. I liked most of them. However, #5
(the leaping leopard) looks like a poor PhotoShop job to me. The very
limited depth of field is strange but feasible (assuming something like
a 400mm at f/2.8 and 50 meters distance). But take a look at the tree
trunk at far right... it's sharper but farther away than the one to its
immediate left. Looks to me as though the photographer did a blurring
job to get the shallow depth of field look but forgot part of the image.
Ugh!
Dr. Focus
On 7/25/2012 8:46 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> PESO"
>
> I don't know if anybody has posted this link. I've been canning tomatoes
> all day and haven't caught up on e-mail.
>
> Some of these are good and some are awful:
>
> http://www.theatlantic.com/infocus/2012/07/national-geographic-traveler-photo-contest-2012/100339/#
>
>
> I'm assuming these are just samples of the entries and not finalists or
> anything?
>
> Tina
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|