I see the whole image changing significantly. I like the moon part but not
quite as aggressively as done.
Tina
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 7/6/2012 8:22 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 6, 2012, at 08:08 AM, Robert Adler wrote:
> >> Thanks Mr. Moose. I am a bit hooked on benches these days. Just wish I
> >> could venture a bit further and wider to find more, but, I have a day
> job
> >> (for now).......
> > FWIW, I mostly prefer the original because I felt the quality of the
> > light on the bench was sacrificed in the moosover, though one of the
> > Meese could probably find a way to save it.
>
> I think your vision is playing tricks on you. Cover the moon with a finger
> and look again. I did absolutely nothing to
> any part of the image but the moon. All done on a separate layer of full
> transparency but for the little circle of the moon.
>
> Unitary Moose
>
> --
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|