These images are underexposed. They also show some chroma noise in the
darker mare. Hard to believe that's in the original exposure which must
have been moderately fast. Maybe an artifact from FastStone? The same
chroma noise is not found in your first exposure of June 29
<http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/2012/Moon-P6298097_cr-srp.jpg>
Chuck Norcutt
On 7/2/2012 3:57 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
> Hi,
>
> See bottom for two more at
> http://www.brianswale.com/zuikoholics/2012/prints1.htm
>
> This will be the last of these for a while from me. See the labels and the
> exif
> info for confirmation
>
> One lens is a Sigma 400/5.6 APO which I bought from Jim Couch quite a
> while ago. On the E-3 it turns out to be a reasonably smart performer.
>
> The last lens is a Zuiko 500/6 mirror lens. I decided to stick with f/8 as it
> was
> the easiest choice..
>
> My tripod is pretty light-weight at 4.6 kg. Even so Edward Weston would
> probably jib at carrying it more than 500 yards.
>
> I kept IS on because the tripod was sitting on thick wool carpet. However, in
> the interests of clarity, I did de-mist the window with a hot fan heater. Too
> damned cold outside, and in any case there was a ruddy great N.Am. oak in
> the way, and as is its wont (and in the interests of keeping the gardener fit
> twice a year), it holds on to half its leaves until spring.
>
> The moon was still shiny silvery tonight. The dark tonings of the images are
> not really what it looks like. But other than making it darker I haven't made
> HUGE changes to its appearance. The file names give a clue to what I did in
> FastStone.
>
> Brian Swale
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
