> For scanning of slides I much prefer Nikonscan, the Kodakchrome settting
> gives rather accurate results.
Other than for the dust, I agree. Nikonscan really is a very fine
program. We always like to dis' the manufacturer's software, but in
this specific case, I think that Nikonscan stands alone as one of the
greats. It is lousy for those 5% situations, but for the 95% rule, it
does an absolutely smashing job.
> I don't know what results you expected, you want them look good to you or
> look close to the original slide? For me I choose the later.
For the long-term archival aspect that Tina's library will be used
for, I would keep the images true to the original slide. I would not
recommend forcing "today's" visual aesthetics on future generations.
AG (two file cabinets) Schnozz
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|