On Thu, Jun 14, 2012, at 01:22 PM, Moose wrote:
> If the scan is right, I think less than 10 is better, and with tonal
> width set right, doesn't mess up overall saturation
> and contrast. Then again, I'm usually headed for some LCE as next step.
Thank you. "Width" is what I had in mind. Less than 10 is certainly
better, but the image dictates this. I have in mind some of the more
problematic KM/R scans I've dealt with. 8^0
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and
love email again
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|