Re: [OM] Asleep with EOS

[Chuck Norcutt]

I'm surprised it's 17mm (34mm equiv).  I'd have guessed wider from the 
distortion of the foot.  Must have been taken up close.

Chuck Norcutt


On 6/9/2012 5:08 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote:
> Ooops, forgot the essential info: Olympus E-P1, 17mm f2.8, ISO 400, 1/90 @
> f2.8
>
> ...Wayne
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Wayne Harridge [mailto:wayne.harridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Saturday, 9 June 2012 7:02 PM
>> To: 'Olympus Camera Discussion'
>> Subject: [OM] Asleep with EOS
>>
>> Ian Potter Gallery, Melbourne, Aus
>>
>> http://www.structuregraphs.com/RandomStuff/9-Jun-
>> 2012/index.html#20120609-B-
>> 029-b.jpg
>>
>> ...Wayne
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> __________________________________________________________
>> _______
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/