Yeah, that's how I do my saving. Although I might use $1000 and only
save $7000...
On 15/05/2012, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So - a new irrelevant camera makes old cameras relevant?
>
> Not exactly. The old irrelevant is no more relevant than it was before
> the new irrelevant was announced. But I am saving myself $8000 by
> being old irrelevant.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|