Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview

Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 17:58:48 -0400
I saw them at the bar earlier discussing 40MP camera phones.  This 
situation is too mundane to gather much attention.

Chuck Norcutt


On 5/7/2012 3:23 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> You say that now, but what until Drs. Focus, Flash, and Diffraction show
> up and slap you upside the head.
>
> Plus, Dr. Raw would say, "RAW is raw."
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Mon, May 7, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> Do you care how it got there if it works?
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 5/7/2012 10:59 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> DXO does have some of those DR specs posted and you can do direct
>>> comparisons. DPREVIEW only compares cameras of same market segment.
>>>
>>> The numbers are stout, but I question how much of that DR is
>>> manufacturered in processing and how much is actually real. From all
>>> evidences, this is the same sensor as is in the G3. If so,
>>> theoretically, it should have identical results in the raw file. But
>>> this goes back to a basic premise that I've preached for years that
>>> "Raw Ain't Raw".
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz