Subject: | Re: [OM] Question for you experts |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 7 May 2012 14:39:42 -0500 |
> This issue makes the Panny multi-aspect ratio sensor very attractive. > It would have been very nice to have that in the OM-D. > Wonder if that is enough to lure AG to a GH3? Doubtful. SWMBO has spoken. Canon Full-Frame it is. On a positive note, it looks like I mgiht have some additional installation revenue tied to the survellience camera sale. That should help matters along. You may also recall that I'm pretty hip on another full-frame Canon too. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 135 Macro (gasp...), Dawid Loubser |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] 135 Macro (gasp...), Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Question for you experts, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Question for you experts, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |