Thanks Moose.
I appreciate the "moosifications", an excellent demonstration.
...Wayne
>
> I'm gonna disagree a little with Bob. :-P I think Chris has it right.
The first two
> are properly exposed to the right,
> but that has left the midtones too dark. The last is just plain
underexposed,
> with data petering out well before the top of the histogram.
>
> With the tones brought up with Levels, the solitary one looks much better.
> Diddle a bit more, and I think it's my favorite of the three.
> <cid:part1.09050605.03020901@gmail.com>
>
> The clump pops up nicely with some brightening, etc. too.
> <cid:part2.03080508.01090902@gmail.com>
>
> As does the area shot.
> <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others//Harridge/Shroomo.htm>
>
> I think they make a nice trio.
>
> Triad Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|