Re: [OM] IMG: Exploring Higher ISO Values

[Jim Nichols]

Thanks for the comment, Moose.  I thought I went a little too far with that 
one.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Exploring Higher ISO Values


> On 5/2/2012 9:41 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>> In my opinion, there is nothing unpleasant about the original, including
>> the "noise."
>
> I agree. As Jim raised the question of noise, I thought I'd show what's 
> easily accomplished in reducing it, if desired.
>
> The problem with noise comes up when one does further processing. What was 
> pleasant can get edgy and dangerous looking.
> Witness the Finches & Chickadee, where I, at least, find it obtrusive in 
> the background.
>
> Low Noise Moose
>
> -- 
> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/