I think I would like the camera too, but I'm not so fond of the lenses.
F3.5-6.3 for the 12-50mm does not leave much room for shallow DOF on 4/3.
Mounting the E-system lenses does not do justice to the small body of the
OM-D.
Just my 2 cents though.
Wiliam
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Wilcox [mailto:jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: woensdag 2 mei 2012 20:20
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] OM-D EM-5 review at dpreview
On Tue, May 1, 2012, at 08:24 PM, Peter Klein wrote:
> They like it, with a few quibbles:
> <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympusem5/>
> --Peter
I'm guessing there is a firmware update in process for focus tracking as we
speak.
Wow, very impressive. Must find the will to resist. There are many
viscerally exciting things about the system.
I was glad to see their comparison of Viewer 2 and ACR. DeepPeeve used to
dismiss the bundled SW even though it was marginally superior to what ACR
could do.
Ken should like the OM-D's film-like tone curve. Body at $1K is about half
the cost of a used mkII body! I hope Olympus sells a ton of them.
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
-----
Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
Versie: 10.0.1424 / Virusdatabase: 2411/4973 - datum van uitgifte: 05/02/12
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|