I don't notice any oversharpening. I like the second shot with the
horse and the foreground in the first one. But I'm bothered by the
blown sky and very low contrast background. I'm sure much of that is
haze but it's aggravated by the overexposure.
It seems that Moose just wrote in response to your equipment lament:
"I do what I can with what I have."
------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm going to disagree a little here. Your long term litany of complaints
about high brightness range subjects and many
posted images with blown highlights lead me to believe you are extremely
reluctant to use exposure compensation and
bracket freely to hold highlights.
And the E-3 is, as far as I can tell, capable of fully professional results
-------------------------------------------------------------------
If you captured this in raw mode there may be a better picture still
lurking there.
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/29/2012 5:12 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
> Two new images on facebook; should be visible to all persons. The last two
> at the bottom.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/827m9xm
>
> They look a bit crunchy to me; maybe oversharpened. To get the best
> enlarged image, right-click on the page image and select 'open in a new
> window' from the drop-down menu (Windows only, probably).
>
> E-3 with 14~54 and 4o~150
>
> Brian Swale.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|