What I think about it is his testing regimen was far too subjective to draw any
meaningful conclusions like that from the data. For more objective data, check
the workof Modern Photography back in the day. I have many of those tests
scanned at posted at www.edsawyer.com/lenstests
Ed
On Apr 28, 2012, at 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [OM] Gary Reese's test of the Zuiko 50/1.2 (really?)
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <EE5C60DE-9AAF-4B91-81F8-75F5E09406A7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> Hi All,
>
> So, at f/2.8 (a pretty nice aperture to shoot at for subtly shallow
> DOF), gary reese tested the Zuiko 50/1.2 to be superiour not only to
> the Zuiko 50mm f/2.0 Macro, but also superior to the Leica M-mount
> 50mm Summicron, and the Leica M-Mount 90mm f/2.0 Apo ASPH. I find that
> incredible - what do you guys think about that?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|