My experience of the 25mm f0.95 was that it had a MUCH narrower depth of field
wide open than a 50mm f1.8.
I know what the maths says but I care little for it - the effect is quite
different.
Oh, and the bokeh just...glowed.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
On 12/04/2012, at 11:18 PM, classicvw@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Well, it would still be an f/ 0.95 which is interesting. ( with a 35mm 2.0
> depth of field, yes)
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|