Subject: | Re: [OM] Happy ... |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:47:00 -0500 |
> I should probably just get a cheap but good 70-200/3.5 of some kind and > call it good. But ... yawn ... I'm in Ken-mode: What is the best > thing for me to use that I will never actually buy? HEY! I represent that. Seriously, your SP 80-200/2.8 is a lens most worthy. That's one of the best lenses I've ever used. So, when are we going to do an OM-only trip again? AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Now THAT's an update, sctroy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 8/4/2012 and 9/4/2012: Catholic señoritas and the beach, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Happy ..., Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Happy ..., Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |