Re: [OM] Happy ...

[Chuck Norcutt]

There are a few which seem to have a busy background but only 1 or 2 
where I thought you'd have been better off with more depth of field. 
For those with a busy background perhaps less depth of field would have 
been better.

Chuck Norcutt


On 4/8/2012 1:48 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> ... spring revitalization/rebirth ritual occasion of your preference.
>
> Today being mine, I have put some more spring flowers in a gallery here
> (it's the April gallery):
>
> http://myweb.uiowa.edu/jfwilcox/index.html
>
> Probably one or two too many of everything, which usually means none
> truly makes the cut.  Oh well.  Appreciating your tolerance -- in
> advance.
>
> OM-5D mk OLD-ONE, Z 90/2 mostly.  Some of the tulips were taken with the
> Z 50/1.2 with 12mm extension or none;  the small blue flowers were taken
> with the 50/1.2 and 25mm extension (they are tiny flowers) -- at f11 or
> 16 there is still almost no DOF.  Makes me yearn to try a bit of
> "stacking."
>
> Joel W.
>
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/