Was the "spectacular" the photographer or the lens ?
I suspect it was the photographer.
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Norton" <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2012 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Boggle Brain
>> The 14-35/2 is a seriously spectacular lens, yes - but when it's in fact
>> bigger and heavier than the "more-than-equivalent" full-frame option
>> (i.e. any modern 24-70/2.8) it's a tad less compelling.
>
> Well, yes and no. For a professional lens for professional event
> photography, I really think it's not that bad. Maybe I have gotten
> used to the 35-80/2.8.
>
> I'm looking at some test shots I took with it. "Spectacular" is a very
> appropriate description.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|