> The 14-35/2 is a seriously spectacular lens, yes - but when it's in fact
> bigger and heavier than the "more-than-equivalent" full-frame option
> (i.e. any modern 24-70/2.8) it's a tad less compelling.
Well, yes and no. For a professional lens for professional event
photography, I really think it's not that bad. Maybe I have gotten
used to the 35-80/2.8.
I'm looking at some test shots I took with it. "Spectacular" is a very
appropriate description.
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|