Subject: | Re: [OM] Big Chomp No Chew |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2012 14:38:35 -0500 |
> I really agree on BW. In most cases BW without some speculars and all > the whites toned down to printable values is a very dull photograph. So > why do we do that to color photographs? Uh oh. Joel, you better not be agreeing with me too much. We'll consider this your quota for the week. :) BTW, guess who got a DZ 300/2.8 to go along with his DZ 150/2? Yup. Tonight I get to play with it for a little bit. You're just over an hour away. 5:30 at his house. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Meet Crash, was:] Retirement and puppy love, SwissPace |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Greyson, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Big Chomp No Chew, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Big Chomp No Chew, Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |