On Wed, Mar 28, 2012, at 09:46 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> > I'll have to try some tests with the 50s I own on the antiquated and
> > irrelevant 5D.
>
> Sorry. Don't take it personally. :)
Never. I just sometimes can't resist going through an open door. :)
> I would agree with your assessment about the 50/1.8. I think that for
> landscape work, where we are stopped down, it is a very nice lens and
> probably a bit better than the 50/1.4. But wider than F5.6 the 50/1.4
> seems to be better. At F2.8, the 50/1.4 is producing a more pleasing
> image. A 50mm, to me, is mostly a long-wide lens. As such, for
> people/event photography, it is used mostly in the 2-4 meter range.
> Based on what I'm seeing, the 50/1.4 is a bit better.
I really suspected as much, but I probably won't go back to find out if
the 50/1.2 is within reach.
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - The way an email service should be
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|