ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Lightroom now good, Studio now bad (was "Re: How'd, they, do t

Subject:	Re: [OM] Lightroom now good, Studio now bad (was "Re: How'd, they, do that?")
From:	Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:33:22 -0700

> I don't mean that it touches the ORF, but in conversion to TIF (or jpg)
> the result is messed up a bit.  Check fine detail at 100% and there are
> jaggies and artifacts here and there.
>
> Joel W.
Thanks for the heads-up on that Joel. I'll check the detail.

Mike
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Lightroom now good, Studio now bad (was "Re: How'd, they, do that?"), Mike Lazzari <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OT) Ramblings & Rumblings, Mike Lazzari
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Clash of the Titans & couple of images, Chuck Norcutt
Previous by Thread:	[OM] (OM) Prints accepted at a gallery, Brian Swale
Next by Thread:	[OM] Retirement and puppy love, Jez Cunningham
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]