http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/Default.aspx?Cat=Canon-Digital-Photo-Professional
Put in OS and free download for the updater.
Many bodies , curiously even those that do not report focus distance,
are supported.
Hmm, I see a combo that the eagle-eyed list logician might be
interested in evaluating.
According to Chuck Westfall, the algorithm addresses many optical flaws:
"A new feature called Digital Lens Optimizer processes RAW images to
achieve ideal optical characteristics for all types of optical
aberration or diffraction, effects of a low-pass filter in front of a
CMOS sensor, etc. This function improves image quality particularly in
the image periphery in addition to the image center. This function is
made possible because the entire design-through-manufacture process,
for camera, CMOS sensor, EF lens, and DPP, is carried out entirely at
Canon. Images are processed optimally using lens information in the
image files (focal length, subject distance, and aperture) and lens
data specially for the Digital Lens Optimizer. (However, the size of a
.CR2 file will be two to three times larger after applying the Digital
Lens Optimizer.) Adjustments are made for such aspects as spherical
aberration, chromatic aberration, astigmatism, curvature of field,
sagittal halo, chromatic aberration of magnification, axial chromatic
aberration, diffraction, and the effects of a low-pass filter in front
of the CMOS sensor. DPP’s Digital Lens Optimizer will be usable with
any of 29 compatible lenses initially. It works with .CR2 files from
EOS models released since 2006 (EOS 30D and forward)."
It see s to be very resource intensive and adds alt data to the .cr2
in lieu of changing out pixels--seems to be a faster way to deal with
it.
Perhaps Adobe could reverse engineer the headers or whatever they use
to tag the processed new .cr2 data.
I have only seen a few 100% clips, but at low ISO seems quite good.
Unlike DXO noise is not removed first so the deconvolution may be
subject to producing more artifacts.
I have seen some sky junk from this that looks easy to fix. How it
does in high ISO remains to be seen. Perhaps some "ringing" artifacts
at high freq transitions but not enough stuff to look at yet.
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/Default.aspx?Cat=Canon-Digital-Photo-Professional
Any takers?--price is right
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/Default.aspx?Cat=Canon-Digital-Photo-Professional
Put in OS and latest 3.11.4 ver comes up as choice.
Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|