On 3/18/2012 8:41 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Your experience confirms my suspicion that bokeh is not entirely a
>> characteristic of a lens, and maybe not even primarily, but is part of
>> the visualization and execution by the photographer.
> Amen, bro.
Yes, and ... Or is that "Yeah, but ..."?
Here's one of the clearer examples I've recently run across. Upper right bokeh
is smooth and creamy, middle right not
quite as good, and upper and middle left show classic dark center and bright,
sharp edges. I intentionally left the edgy
stuff to show the effect.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=SFBayArea/Tilden_Botanic_Garden&image=_MG_5729rotcroof30m.jpg>
In this case, it's all in the distances.
Just to stay on subject, without going to the trouble of changing it and
confusing everyone. ;-)
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=SFBayArea/Tilden_Botanic_Garden&image=_MG_5722croof30.jpg>
Bokeh B. Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
