About the only difference I can see is that the Oly is a somewhat
smaller image and is far more saturated and, oh, the images are not the
same. The oly image contains some small colored balls in two different
areas that are not there in the Canon shot.
It would appear that there was some attempt to equalize DOF. The Oly
shot was made at 45mm and f/6.3, the Canon shot at 100mm and f/11...
which also puts both sensors in diffraction territory.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/12/2012 7:51 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Interesting to look at higher ISO samples of OM-D compared to the new
> Canyon. Can only tell so much out of in cam jpegs, but still. More
> dof in Oly shots too as well as known excellent in cam jpeg engine can
> skew the comparison. Still will be curious to see how many lens caps
> AG and other listees give it. They must have done something right.
>
> Canon:
> http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1779792/iso-1600?inalbum=canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-low-light-iso-samples
>
> Oly (NR off):
> http://www.dpreview.com/galleries/reviewsamples/photos/1798861/iso-1600_nf-off?inalbum=olympus-om-d-e-m5-low-light-iso-samples
>
> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|