OK, I was wrong but it has to be some camera that can mount an OM via
adapter. Canon is the logical other choice unless you want to go
mirrorless with Sony or whatever the future will bring.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/6/2012 10:40 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I'm not puzzled. Putting the two things together would indicate to me a
>> tying of old OM to new OM and looking to Olympus for advertising. A
>> good choice I should think.
>
>
> Nifty idea, but no. Anybody who thinks I'm a sellout now would be
> totally throwing me under the bus.
>
> Hmm. Canon????
>
> AG (tire treads) Schnozz
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|