Hi John,
When I was shooting film, I found XP2 and T400CN to scan much easier than
traditional B&W films. The only reason I did not use those two films
exclusively is that I would need to pay someone to process them, whereas I
souped normal B&W film myself. But if you have a decent C41 processor
available, these films are hard to beat.
Cheers,
Nathan
On 4 Mar, 2012, at 17:29 , John Hudson wrote:
> Can anyone point me to hard or anecdotal evidence about the scanability of
> C41 process black and white film and in particular Ilford XP2 400 iso, Kodak
> Porta 400BW 400 iso, and Kodak T400CN 400 iso and also whether any one of
> the three films is a clear leader over the other two.
>
> Thanks.
>
> jh
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com
Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
Blog:
http://www.nathansmusings.eu/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|