Thanks, Chris. After processing them both, I agree.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Crocus Without Flash
> The one without flash is much prettier, Jim. I prefer natural light where
> I can use it and that lighting looks quite sufficient, as well as being
> suitably diffuse.
>
> Chris
>
> On 25 Feb 2012, at 22:01, Jim Nichols wrote:
>
>> The Croci were in very poor light. Here is a shot without the fill
>> flash. Perhaps, after all, it is the better image, though highlights
>> from the sun are blown in both of the images.
>>
>> Original, with fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus85.jpg.html
>>
>> Without fill flash:
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Crocus82.jpg.html
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
