Hi Moose,
Thanks for moosifying that, its a significant improvement, "back in
focus" offers various algorithms but I was trying to do I without
layers, I should have realised by now that I need to learn how to use
layers and I can't take shortcuts without limitations. Maybe I will also
make the effort of trying focus magic in windows as the results you get
amaze me.
Thanks again
On 21/02/2012 10:31, Moose wrote:
> On 2/20/2012 11:40 PM, SwissPace wrote:
>> ...
>> I like that shot but the out of focus eye of my mother has been
>> disturbing me so I have been trying some deconvolution programs to see
>> if I can correct it but my first attempts just bring out the detail in
>> the skin which makes it very uncomplimentary.
> I don't think you will find anything that will sharpen it to match the biting
> focus on the other cheek and around the
> other eye. But then do you really want that?
>
> Using different amounts of FM with masks, one can easily give the impression
> that the closer eye is sharp, even though
> it still isn't very sharp. By brightening the white of that eye (maybe too
> much) and softening the other cheek, the
> nearer eye becomes the natural place for the eye to notice, without the
> comparison of a much sharper area. And it looks
> pretty sharp at web
> size.<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Swiss/Cai_and_his_Nanan.htm>
>
> I suspect it would look good at least up to 8x10.
>
>
> Focusing Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|