I know what they mean - he gushes a bit and when you've been to a ra-ra launch,
it's a bit hard not too. I'm sure that it'll have its flaws and its detractors,
as the system shakes down - but it's not a camera, it's a system. I think
that's Oly's point at this time. That's why the grandiose 'Epoch Changing'
statements were made. They're trying to recapture the impact of the OM-1.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 09/02/2012, at 2:39 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Reads like dribble from a company spokesperson.
>
> I think Kirk's analysis of the camera is pretty much dead on. What
> kinda grouses me is that he wrote what I was writing. So back to the
> drawing board and to come up with a different perspective. Otherwise,
> it's just an echo.
>
> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|