Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-D specs! |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:46:11 -0800 |
> I have always thought the E-620 to be the most desirable non "Pro" body. As have I. It occupies a sweet spot between $$ and features. I don't see today (or yesterday) as changing that. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D Official Announcement, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Snow, graves and a poet, Mike Lazzari |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Chris Trask |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D specs!, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |