I have no qualms with that. It's just that it should be made clear that
this is a system test of lens, camera and user (sans tripod), not a lens
test. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/6/2012 10:50 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> Future testes will be done with a tripod and a camera with live-view.
> We'll eliminate the variables. Especially the AG variable. I was
> pretty well caffeinated and sugared up at that point. But that's how I
> always am, so it was a real-life shooting situation for me.
>
> Of course, we still run the risk of criticism because I didn't take
> into account lunar phase, sunspots and so forth. It's like when Gary
> did all his lens tests. The criticisms of his methods were never
> ending. That may be so, but they are the only such tests out there and
> www.zone-10.com gets about 200 unique visitors every day referencing
> them. Not too different than my OM-3Ti review. It's not the best
> review around, but it's about the only OM-3Ti review around.
>
> My goal after all this is over, is to have a reference test that
> adequately shows the average person what to expect from some of these
> lenses.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|