I'm happy to grant you a lifetime and even more to your descendents as
long as you've only sold a copy and not the original. But for a
photograph I would define the original as the negative or digital image,
not a print.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/28/2012 3:35 AM, Chris Crawford wrote:
> That's why copyright has been extended to such a long time; copyright was
> originally only 17 years. I am happy its been extended longer. I have a
> lot of photos I make money from that I did more than 17 yrs ago, and I'm
> still pretty young at 36. I think it should be the artist's lifetime for
> work by individual artists like us. Corporate work doesn't need the
> current time, which is about 150 years if I remember right.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|