Yes, that's it exactly. I had forgotten where I read it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/25/2012 1:33 AM, Moose wrote:
> On 1/18/2012 7:43 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> It was my understanding (from where I don't know) that ACR and some
>> other converters try to go the manufacturer's converters one better by
>> extrapolating beyond the clipped channel. How they do that and how
>> successful they are I don't know.
>
> They do it by guessing based on near pixels.
>
> This is the only clear example I know of. The software has all been updated
> since and it's not generalizable to other
> camera, especially non Canon. However, it does present a good example of how
> different approaches may give quite
> different results.<http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos5d/page23.asp>
>
> Recovering Moose
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|