Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2012 14:47:26 -0800 |
On 1/21/2012 10:08 AM, Bill Pearce wrote: > Let me say this again: What I want in a FF digital OM that takes all my > legacy lenses. And, since most of my photography is done with WA lenses 28 > and wider, that lets out the OM-D (or any other m4/3) and an adapter. http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/01/a-guess.html FWIW Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Sensor cleaning, NSURIT |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sensor cleaning, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |