Subject: | Re: [OM] Kodak Chapter 11 |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:48:47 -0000 |
The employing corporation ALWAYS has access to pension funds in the sense that the employer contributions are (obviously) the responsibility of the employer! But I think it's more subtle than that - since pension fund contributions represent a drain on tax revenue (taxable profits are reduced by the amount contributed to the pension scheme) it is in the government's interest to control how much goes into the pension scheme, to ensure that the scheme is not over-funded as a way of avoiding tax on profits. I distinctly recall that for all of the latter half of the 1980s there were zero employer contributions to my then employer's pension scheme, based on actuarial computations that the scheme was adequately funded. A problem arises when external factors reduce the scheme's income from investments AND at the same time reduce the employer's profits from which contributions are to be made to make up the suddenly-arisen shortfall. Piers -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Fildes [mailto:afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 19 January 2012 21:39 To: Olympus Camera Discussion Subject: Re: [OM] Kodak Chapter 11 I still can't understand how a corporation can have ANY access to pension funds, bankruptcy notwithstanding --snip -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Kodak Chapter 11, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sagelight editor, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Kodak Chapter 11, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Kodak Chapter 11, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |