I suspect Lightroom and Aperture are on parallel paths. Wouldn't expect anyone
to switch, unless for a specific reason.
Practice is good. I need a lot more of it. Getting tired of this self-inflicted
studio/gallery reorganization. I believe now it was all a plot by the universe
to keep me from doing what I'm supposed to be doing.
--Bob
On Jan 10, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I suspect that LR is still better than Aperture, but the latter has a book
> output system already.
>
> However, I'm sticking with Aperture for 2 reasons: I already have a few
> libraries and I need to practise with it if I am to get a retirement job when
> I retire for the second time in a couple of years.
>
> Chris
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|