That would be nice. Do you have to fake out the SSK by adding or
removing the magnet which tells it which tank is loaded, or can you
select that?
I agree that the Sidekick gives results that are just as good as I've
seen come from the labs. In fact, my "local" (still a 45 minute drive
one way) lab screwing up one of my rolls, coupled with an A&I mailer
getting lost in the mail, are what prompted me to get the Sidekick in
the first place. At least this way, if something is messed up it's my
own fault.
Mark
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Sawyer, Edward <Ed.Sawyer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Mark, I just got the 4x5 holder too, havent tried it yet either. A pricey
> peice of plastic! I am going to try and see if the chemistry load for 2 rolls
> will cover the 4 pieces of film, it would be great if it does since it would
> save some chemistry cost.
>
> Don, the ssk is every bit as good and reliable as any dip and dunk process in
> my experience. I used to have piles of e6 processed via d&d and it seemed no
> more reliable, in fact sometimes it seemed less reliable. Depended on the
> operator more than the ssk does.
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Jan 8, 2012, at 6:16 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> I also have a Phototherm processor, which is extremely easy to use. I
>> haven't tried C-41 in it yet, just E-6 and B&W. The company is still
>> around and supporting them and I just got the 4x5 film holder for it,
>> which I am looking forward to trying out.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|