Hmmm. I wonder if Chris will jump on my use/invention(?) of "contrastier".
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/6/2012 12:30 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Can't scan the negative? That will give you a much better and
> contrastier image.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 1/6/2012 10:08 AM, Don Holbrook wrote:
>> Thanks, Chris. I hope you scrolled down a touch for the larger image size.
>> The darkroom print was flat and I will reshoot the subject. Comments
>> appreciated.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Chris Barker<ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Olympus Camera Discussion<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 07:02:51 -0000 (UTC)
>> Subject: Re: [OM] 1st photo post corrected!
>>
>> Thanks, Don.
>>
>> I'm less of a critic than many on the List, but I'll have a go . . .
>>
>> The images on display are quite small, so it's not that easy to appreciate,
>> but I like the composition and the use of the lens's characteristics.
>> However, the tones are quite pale and I should like perhaps to see more
>> contrast.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 6 Jan 2012, at 04:14, Don Holbrook wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks to Mr. Beckrich, the following should work. Pardon the confusion.
>>>
>>> www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=172587
>>>
>>> www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=172736
>>>
>>> OM-4T, 16 Zuiko fisheye, Tmax 400
>>> --
>>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|